According to LAUAND, ' ' The quaestio disputata, integrates the proper essence of the scholastic education. It was not enough to listen to the exposition of great books of the thought occidental person for a master; it was essential that the great ideas if examined critically in dispute. the disputatio, in the conception of Pieper, exceeds the organizacional scope of studium medieval and in general arrives until constituting the proper essence of the university ' '. Thus, we see that the basic one in the Average Age was not to prove or to disapprove the thought of each pupil or author, but the objective age to give voice to these so that then the thought safer, more was based, because ahead in the way as the questions were displayed, had a certainty of what he was considered right or wrong for each master who if considered to teach its pupils. All ' ' quaestio disputata' ' it follows standard the same, as LAUAND affirms, ' ' A quaestio disputata is dedicated to a subject and is divided in articles, that correspond the chapters or aspects of this subject. For detrs of? pedagogical technique? it is a spirit: the quaestio disputata, …, translate the proper idea of inteligibilidade, at the same time that of incompreensibilidade, of thought? negative? , also established in the Verbum. Looking for to propagate in method vocation of polifnico, first dialogue enunciates it thesis of each article (under the controversy form) and the quaestio starts for giving voice to the adversary for obiectiones, objections to the thesis that the master intends sustentar' '. still according to LAUAND, ' ' after the objections, arise against-objections (fast and prompt sentences harvested for the thesis of the article). After to hear these voices, the master thematically displays its thesis in the body of the article, the responsio (solution).