In a written second, the Office of the public prosecutor it justified the lack of IU legitimation in which this one does not have the character of interested in the subject in not to have credited the legitimate interest with which it says to act. According to the public prosecutor, to be able to claim the fundamental right of meeting, is precise at least that their holder, that is to say the physical or legal person who wishes to take to effect a concentration, meeting or manifestation in public place, is he promotes who it or he summons. In the case of cars, the public prosecutor continues, it does not consist that the political formation has summoned, promoted or organized concentration, meeting or manifestation some in the days that legally are predicted for the days of reflection and voting, reason why does not have the interested character of insofar as he is not holder of the meeting right that now to try to exercise in the name of others. To first hours of afternoon, the Supreme Court had by interposed a resource of IU against the decision of the Central Electoral Meeting and he gave of term to the Public prosecutor and the Electoral Meeting until the five of afternoon presenting/displaying allegations. The resource was formulated under protection of the Law of Jurisdictional Protection of the Fundamental Rights, that it has preferred procedure. IU asked that it was suspended precautionarily the agreement of the Central Electoral Meeting. The resource corresponded to the magistrates of the Section Eighth of the Room of the Contentious thing, integrated by the president of the Room, Jose Manuel Sieira, and the magistrates Nicholas Maurandi and Pablo Lucas Murillo of the Cave, the three of progressive will. In addition they integrate the room the magistrate rapporteur, Vicente Count and Jose Thin Diaz, both of preservative will. The Central Electoral Meeting had solved at night of the past Friday that the request of emission of vote in favor of candidacies or the invitation to exclude others in the exercise of the right of the vote is a behavior not in agreement with the Electoral Law and that it exceeds the manifestation right. Source of the news: : The Supreme one rejects the resource and maintains the prohibition of the Meeting
Simplicity. Optimum in preliminary studies induce to ignore effects not induced intuitively. Networks of interaction (on one determined action of the project see what medium can affect and what means may be affected indirectly by this condition). Visualization of the causal connection. Excessive complication in great performances. Possible duplication.
Arrays of impacts. (crosses into a table between project actions and elements of the medium) Synthetic character. Qualitative and quantitative data. Much subjectivity. Non-selective character. Table 1.-main models of environmental impact assessment. There are four types of impact matrix (which we’ve given): or Normal.
(already commented above). Actions of the project resources of the MA that can be affected by the actions of the project. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Where each symbol to be given a meaning (significant impact, not significant, etc.). We can also put numbers and thus somehow quantify impacts. or cause and effect. It has the advantage that there are very different versions (methodological flexibility) and is very simple to (once known (well the cause-effect relationships). It has the disadvantage that it is not possible to incorporate a dynamic considerations to it. or interactive. It has the advantage that shows relationships of dependency between different impacts, but has the problem that requires more theoretical knowledge due to its complexity. Elements of the MA that can be affected by the project the project actions that can cause impacts. Actions of the project whose impacts may be amplified by other actions (actions of project interactions). That it may be complicated as many times as necessary. or temporary. It has the advantage that reflects timelines for each of the tasks and phases.